| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, levertond(at)googlemail(dot)com, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |
| Date: | 2014-06-06 20:58:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20140606205801.GB23201@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2014-06-06 16:55:58 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Keith Fiske wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the same issue originally reported, but the description
> > sounded the same. I can get this to happen pretty reliably in 9.4beta1 with
> > the pgtap test suite for one of my extensions -
>
> Uh, this is a completely different problem. We discussed long ago that
> those pallocs in relpath() were going to cause a problem:
I actually don't think it's a different problem. If we'd restructure
things so the critical sections are separate this wouldn't be a
problem. It's imo not a particularly good idea to mdopen() inside a
critical section either.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Fiske | 2014-06-06 21:44:18 | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-06-06 20:55:58 | Re: BUG #10533: 9.4 beta1 assertion failure in autovacuum process |