Re: [HACKERS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Daniel O'Connor <darius(at)dons(dot)net(dot)au>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date: 2014-06-04 22:59:06
Message-ID: 20140604225906.GK785@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2014-06-03 10:37:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It hasn't even got a comment saying why changes here should
> receive any scrutiny; moreover, it's not in a file where changes would be
> likely to excite suspicion. (Probably it should be in opr_sanity, if
> we're going to have such a thing at all.)

I've written up the attached patch that moves the test to opr_sanity and
adds a littlebit of commentary. Will apply unless somebody protests in
the next 24h or so.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Move-regression-test-listing-of-builtin-leakproof-fu.patch text/x-patch 26.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-06-04 23:03:15 Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-04 18:22:42 Re: BUG #10527: TRAP when joining local table with view on tds_fdw foreign table

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2014-06-04 23:07:55 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-04 22:57:31 Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE