Re: strtoll/strtoull emulation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: strtoll/strtoull emulation
Date: 2014-06-03 15:04:35
Message-ID: 20140603150435.GF1220@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-06-03 10:55:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I recently had the need to use strtoull() in postgres code. Only to
> > discover that that's not available on some platforms. IIRC windows/msvc
> > was one of them. Now 9d7ded0f4277f5c0063eca8e871a34e2355a8371 added
> > another user - guarded by HAVE_STRTOULL. That commit will make things
> > worse on windows btw...
>
> Worse than what? AFAICT, the old code would produce complete garbage
> on Windows. The new code at least gives the right answer for rowcounts
> up to 4GB.

Hm? Wouldn't it only have produced garbage on mingw and not msvc?

> > How about adding emulation for strtoll/strtoull to port/? The BSDs have
> > easily crib-able functions available...
>
> Ugh. Surely Windows has got *some* equivalent, perhaps named differently?

Apparently they've added strtoull()/stroll() to msvc 2013... And there's
_strtoui64() which seems to have already existed a while back.

But it seems easier to me to add one fallback centrally somewhere that
works on all platforms. I am not sure that msvc is the only platform
missing strtoull() - although I didn't find anything relevant in a quick
search through the buildfarm. So maybe I am worrying over nothing.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-03 15:04:58 Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2014-06-03 14:56:42 Re: Proposing pg_hibernate