Re: Re: Logical slots not mentioned in CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT for replication protocol docs

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Logical slots not mentioned in CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT for replication protocol docs
Date: 2014-05-31 14:02:55
Message-ID: 20140531140255.GB4286@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-05-30 08:12:35 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks, this looks good. But shouldn't the bit about output plugin
> > options mention say something like:
> >
> > ( option_name option_argument [, ...] )
> >
> > ...instead of just:
> >
> > ( option [, ...] )
> > ?
> Yes, true. Here is an updated patch.

I've pushed the patch with some additional changes. Hope they make sense
to you.

I wonder whether START_REPLICATION ... LOGICAL should be folded into
... PHYSICAL since they have most things in common. But it'd be a
awfully complicated description.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-31 14:09:36 Re: FOR [SHARE|UPDATE] NOWAIT may still block in EvalPlanQualFetch
Previous Message reiner peterke 2014-05-31 08:01:29 Re: unable to build postgres-9.4 in os x 10.9 with python