Re: 9.4 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.4 release notes
Date: 2014-05-20 18:09:39
Message-ID: 20140520180939.GA3701@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:48AM -0400, David Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:08:47PM -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> > Some errors and suggestions - my apologizes for the format as I do not
> have
> > a proper patching routine setup.
> >
>
> Sorry, let me address some items I skipped on your list:
>
> > IIUC: Logical decoding allows for streaming of statement-scoped database
> > changes.
>
> I think Logical decoding does more than statement-scoped database
> changes, e.g. it can enable multi-master without triggers.  I am
> hesitant to mention specific items in the release notes for that reason.
>
>
> ​Yeah, probably need to look at this as a bigger unit of work and better
> understand it first.  But 
> "​to be optionally streamed in a configurable format" seems too vague.

Yes, it seems vague to me too, but that's the text the features author
proposed.

> > IIUC: Remove line length restrictions from pgbench.
>
>
> Uh, there is a specific place we removed the ne length restriction in
> pg_bench.
>
>
> ​​I simply interpreted:
>
> ​Allow pgbench to process script files of any line length (Sawada Masahiko)
>
> The previous line limit was BUFSIZ.
> ​
> "script files of any line length" just doesn't sound right to me; and if my
> re-wording is wrong then it also does not actually communicate what was changed
> very well.
>  

Agreed. Here is the new text:

Remove line length limit for <application>pgbench</> scripts

> > style: add comma -> Previously[,] empty arrays were returned (occurs
> > frequently but is minor)
>
> Thanks for the comma adjustments --- I can't decide on that sometimes.
>
>
> ​Not a grammar expert by any means but there are generally two uses of
> "previously".

Thanks for the tips.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2014-05-20 18:18:29 Re: rangetypes spgist questions/refactoring
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-05-20 17:32:38 Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?