From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |
Date: | 2014-05-10 20:02:39 |
Message-ID: | 20140510200239.GT2556@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> What I have said is that authors of CustomJoins or CustomScans should
> declare in advance via system catalogs which operators their new code
> works with so that Postgres knows when it is appropriate to call them.
I guess I just took that as given, since the discussion has been about
GPUs and there will have to be new operators since there will be
different code (CUDA-or-whatever GPU-language code).
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-05-10 20:04:36 | Re: Weird behaviour with the new MOVE clause of ALTER TABLESPACE |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2014-05-10 19:41:25 | Lossy bitmap scan is broken in GIN |