Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Date: 2014-05-10 20:02:39
Message-ID: 20140510200239.GT2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> What I have said is that authors of CustomJoins or CustomScans should
> declare in advance via system catalogs which operators their new code
> works with so that Postgres knows when it is appropriate to call them.

I guess I just took that as given, since the discussion has been about
GPUs and there will have to be new operators since there will be
different code (CUDA-or-whatever GPU-language code).

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-05-10 20:04:36 Re: Weird behaviour with the new MOVE clause of ALTER TABLESPACE
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2014-05-10 19:41:25 Lossy bitmap scan is broken in GIN