| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2014-05-06 18:51:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20140506185118.GU2556@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> On 5/2/14, 2:22 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'm aware and I really am not convinced that pushing all of this to
> > contrib modules using the hooks is the right approach- for one thing, it
> > certainly doesn't seem to me that we've actually gotten a lot of
> > traction from people to actually make use of them and keep them updated.
> > We've had many of those hooks for quite a while.
>
> What is there to update? The stuff works and doesn't necessarily need
> any changes.
I'm referring to auditing/logging systems built on top of those, not the
hooks themselves..
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-05-06 18:57:43 | Re: Issue with GRANT/COMMENT ON FUNCTION with default |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-05-06 18:49:47 | Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL |