Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?
Date: 2014-04-25 01:20:45
Message-ID: 20140425012045.GB2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Craig Ringer (craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 10:06 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I've uploaded the latest patch, rebased against master, with my
> > changes to here: http://snowman.net/~sfrost/rls_ringerc_sf.patch.gz
> > as I don't believe it'd clear the mailing list (it's 29k).
>
> Does this exist in the form of an accessible git branch, too?

Eh, no.

> I was trying to maintain the patch as a series of distinct changes to
> make it easier to see what each part is doing, and it'd be nice to
> preserve that if possible. It also makes seeing what's changed a lot
> easier.

Yeah, I almost just posted a patch against your tree. I'll look at
doing that tomorrow.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-04-25 01:46:36 Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-04-25 00:51:28 Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?