Re: logical changeset generation v6

On 2014-04-24 09:46:07 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>wrote:
>
> > On 2014-04-24 09:39:21 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus,
> > but
> > > I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we
> > > couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was
> > the
> > > best?
> >
> > I went with pg_recvlogical because that's where the (small) majority
> > seemed to be. Even if I was unconvinced. There were so many outstanding
> > big fights at that point that I didn't want to spend my time on this ;)
> >
> >
> I was guessing something like the second part there, which is why I figured
> this would be a good time to bring this fight back up to the surface ;)

I have to admit that I still don't care too much. By now I'd tentatively
want to stay with the current name because that's what I got used to,
but if somebody else has strong opinions and finds concensus...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services