| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-24 02:14:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20140424021437.GA926082@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:25:35PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> > > If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
> > > but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
> > > no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
> > > helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
> >
> > I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
> > Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.
>
> I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
> have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.
I agree. The ideal is nobody wishing for an option, but I'd rather have the
option if a non-theoretical set of users is feeling the pain of its absence.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2014-04-24 04:32:41 | Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table |
| Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2014-04-24 01:57:24 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |