| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor(at)pr(dot)hu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead |
| Date: | 2014-04-24 01:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20140424015436.GA910666@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:15:41AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Whether this review is enough to move the patch to "ready for committer"
> - I tend to let the next CFM decide. (I don't find it productive to
> ignite another round of discussion about kinds of reviews - already saw
> some.)
In today's CF process, we trust reviewers to make that decision. When all
unambiguous defects known to you have been resolved, please mark the patch
Ready for Committer. Your review covered more ground than the average review,
so don't worry about it being too cursory to qualify.
Thanks,
nm
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Wong | 2014-04-24 01:57:24 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-24 01:28:11 | Re: extension_control_path |