Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:52:48PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On 4/21/14, 12:47 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Asking for help to address the FreeBSD performance would have
> >been much better received. Thanks, Stephen
>
> That is exactly what I did, I asked for a version of postgresql that
> was easy to switch at runtime between two behaviors.
>
> That would make it a LOT easier to run a few scripts and make sure I
> got the correct binary without having to munge PREFIX and a bunch of
> PATH and other tools to get my test harness to DTRT.

I think the big point is that you must realize that we are dealing with
thousands of users, so making a suggestion without considering its
impact on those thousands of people is not helpful.

We have clearly stated the need to consider those thousands of users,
and you are still saying the same thing --- this would make it easy for
"me". This is not helpful to the discussion, and you must realize that
at some level.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +