Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-21 16:13:38
Message-ID: 20140421161337.GS2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alfred Perlstein (alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org) wrote:
> Can the package builder not set the default for the runtime tunable?

Yeah, I was thinking about that also, but at least in this case it seems
pretty clear that the 'right' answer is known at build time.

> Honestly we're about to select a db platform for another FreeBSD
> based system we are building, I strongly hoping that we can get back
> to sysvshm easily otherwise we may have to select another store.

Is there no hope of this getting fixed in FreeBSD..? PG wouldn't be the
only application impacted by this, I'm sure...

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-21 16:14:26 Re: assertion failure 9.3.4
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-04-21 16:13:36 Re: Composite Datums containing toasted fields are a bad idea(?)