| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
| Date: | 2014-04-10 17:10:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20140410171035.GG6917@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:05:32PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> If it's conditional I think "when it matches a guc" is too hard for users to
> use.
Yes, we gave up on having the OID display match the GUC; we just
display something if and only if it oids are present.
Robert is talking about the "Identity Replica" display, which is new in
9.4 and should match how we display oids. Right now "Identity Replica"
only displays something if the user changed the default.
> I think "say nothing if oids are off and say something of their on" would be
> fine. It would result in clutter for users which oids on by default but that's
> a non default setting.
Yes, that is what the proposed patch does.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2014-04-10 17:38:38 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2014-04-10 17:05:32 | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |