Re: GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2014-04-04 15:07:26
Message-ID: 20140404150726.GH14419@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-04-04 16:50:36 +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 04:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >This patch looks like it can be applied much more realistically, but it
> >looks too late for 9.4. I suggest moving it to the next CF?
>
> If it does not change the default operator class I do not see anything
> preventing it from being applied to 9.4, as long as the committers have the
> time to look at this. My review is done and I think the first patch is ok
> and useful by itself.

Well, the patch was marked as needs review, not ready for committer. So,
if that's your position, re-check the latest version and mark it as
ready.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-04-04 15:18:10 Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-04-04 15:06:16 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In checkpoint, move the check for in-progress xacts out of criti