Re: GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2014-04-04 14:01:13
Message-ID: 20140404140113.GC14419@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2014-03-08 23:40:31 +0200, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> Fourth version of the patch attached. It is rebased to the HEAD (8879fa0).
> Operator name formatting patch rebased on top of it. I will put
> the selectivity estimation patch to the next commit fest.
>
> This version of the patch does not touch to the btree_gist extension,
> does not set the operator class as the default. It adds support to
> the not equals operator to make the operator class compatible with
> the btree_gist extension.

This patch looks like it can be applied much more realistically, but it
looks too late for 9.4. I suggest moving it to the next CF?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-04-04 14:01:37 Re: Dynamic Shared Memory stuff
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-04-04 13:56:38 Re: Allocations in critical section (was Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5))