From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d |
Date: | 2014-03-23 03:47:57 |
Message-ID: | 20140323034757.GC5606@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:37:09AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Patch attached.
>
> I vote for showing it only with +, but regardless of whether the value
> matches the expected default. I'd keep the relkind test, though,
> because I think I noticed that it currently shows up for indexes,
> which is dumb.
Is this the patch you had in mind? I kept the pg_catalog filter. Do we
want to always show the replica identity line for \d+?
test=> \d+ test
Table "public.test"
Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
--------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
x | integer | | plain | |
Replica Identity: full
Has OIDs: no
I used lower-case for the value, rather than all-caps.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
replica.diff | text/x-diff | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-03-23 05:57:43 | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-03-23 00:27:32 | Re: jsonb status |