Re: Cleaner build output when not much has changed

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleaner build output when not much has changed
Date: 2014-03-11 00:12:39
Message-ID: 20140311001239.GO4759@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> writes:
> > > I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,
> > > specifically, I wanted to eliminate the "Nothing to be done for `all' "
> > > messages, since they don't add much value, and just ad to the clutter.
> >
> > Why don't you just use "make -s" if you don't want to see that?
> > The example output you show is not much less verbose than before.
>
> I have a shell function that now adds --no-print-directory to my make
> command. This patch combined with that switch makes the output really clean
> (at least from my perspective). Since the use of a command-line switch can
> be easily left to personal choice, I am not proposing to add that or its
> makefile-equivalent. But modifying the makefiles to suppress noise is not
> that everyone can be expected to do, and do it right.

FWIW you can add a src/Makefile.custom file with this:

all:
@true

and it will get rid of most noise.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-03-11 01:13:36 Re: pg_upgrade on high number tables database issues
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-03-11 00:12:15 Re: jsonb and nested hstore