Re: Little confusing things about client_min_messages.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Little confusing things about client_min_messages.
Date: 2014-03-08 16:51:54
Message-ID: 20140308165154.GA4690@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:31:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > [ client_min_messages = info is not documented ]
>
> That's intentional, because it's not a useful setting. Even more so
> for the other two.

Well, 'info' is between other settings we do document, so I am not clear
why info should be excluded. It is because we always output INFO to the
client? From elog.c:

if (ClientAuthInProgress)
output_to_client = (elevel >= ERROR);
else
output_to_client = (elevel >= client_min_messages ||
elevel == INFO);

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-08 17:12:21 Re: Little confusing things about client_min_messages.
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2014-03-08 16:49:47 Re: gaussian distribution pgbench