Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9
Date: 2014-03-03 22:43:25
Message-ID: 20140303224325.GJ17253@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Robert, Everyone!

On 2014-03-03 16:48:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, I've committed the 0001 patch, which is the core of this feature,
> with a bit of minor additional hacking.

Many, many, thanks!

> I'm sure there are some problems here yet and some things that people
> will want fixed, as is inevitable for any patch of this size. But I
> don't have any confidence that further postponing commit is going to
> be the best way to find those issues, so in it goes.

Unsurprisingly I do agree with this. It's a big feature, and there's
imperfection. But I think it's a good start.

A very first such imperfection is that the buildfarm doesn't actually
excercise make check in contribs, just make installcheck... Which this
patch doesn't use because the tests require wal_level=logical and
max_replication_slots >= 2. Andrew said on IRC that maybe it's a good
idea to add a make-contrib-check stage to the buildfarm.

A patch fixing a couple of absolutely trivial things is attached.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
trivial-fixups.patch text/x-patch 2.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2014-03-03 23:00:43 Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Previous Message Noah Misch 2014-03-03 22:42:35 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe