Re: inherit support for foreign tables

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Date: 2014-02-21 06:23:21
Message-ID: 20140221.152321.92712524.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> >> NOTICE: Child foregn table child01 is affected.
> >> NOTICE: Child foregn table child02 is affected
> >> NOTICE: Child foregn table child03 rejected 'alter tempmin set
> >> default'
> >>
> >> What do you think about this? It looks a bit too loud for me
> >> though...
> >
> > I think that's a good idea.
>
> I just thought those messages would be shown for the user to readily
> notice the changes of the structures of child tables that are foreign,
> done by the recursive altering operation. But I overlooked the third
> line:
>
> NOTICE: Child foregn table child03 rejected 'alter tempmin set
> default'
>
> What does "rejected" in this message mean?

It says that child03 had no ability to perform the requested
action, in this case setting a default value. It might be better
to reject ALTER on the parent as a whole when any children
doesn't accept any action.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2014-02-21 07:03:34 Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-02-21 04:38:44 Re: walsender doesn't send keepalives when writes are pending