Re: Do you know the reason for increased max latency due to xlog scaling?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do you know the reason for increased max latency due to xlog scaling?
Date: 2014-02-17 16:46:12
Message-ID: 20140217164612.GH18388@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-18 01:35:52 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> >On 2014-02-18 00:43:54 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> >>I'm worried about the big increase in max latency. Do you know the
> >>cause?
> >>More frequent checkpoints caused by increased WAL volume thanks to
> >>enhanced
> >>performance?
> >
> >I don't see much evidence of increased latency there? You can't really
> >compare the latency when the throughput is significantly different.
>
> For example, please see the max latencies of test set 2 (PG 9.3) and test
> set 4 (xlog scaling with padding). They are 207.359 and 1219.422
> respectively. The throughput is of course greatly improved, but I think the
> response time should not be sacrificed as much as possible. There are some
> users who are sensitive to max latency, such as stock exchange and online
> games.

You need to compare both at the same throughput to have any meaningful
comparison.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-17 16:51:34 Re: Ctrl+C from sh can shut down daemonized PostgreSQL cluster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-17 16:39:20 Re: Decimal values in