Re: GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2014-02-17 12:54:41
Message-ID: 20140217125441.GA18388@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-17 14:40:07 +0200, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> 2014-02-07 22:41, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> > Generally, modifying already-release .sql files for extensions is a no-no...
>
> I prepared separate patches for btree_gist extension with more options.
> First one (btree-gist-drop-default-inet-v1.patch) removes DEFAULT keyword
> only from the inet and the cidr operator classes. Second one
> (btree-gist-drop-default-all-v1.patch) removes DEFAULT keyword for all
> operator classes. I think it is more consistent to remove it from all.
> Third one (btree-gist-drop-inet-v1.patch) removes the inet and the cidr
> operator classes altogether. It is suggested by Tom Lane [1] on bug #5705.
> The new GiST operator class includes basic comparison operators except !=
> so it may be the right time to remove support from btree_gist. Fourth one
> (btree-gist-drop-inet-and-default-v1.patch) is the second one and the third
> one together.
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10183.1287526949@sss.pgh.pa.us

> diff --git a/contrib/btree_gist/Makefile b/contrib/btree_gist/Makefile
> index ba4af14..d5b1fd7 100644
> --- a/contrib/btree_gist/Makefile
> +++ b/contrib/btree_gist/Makefile
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ OBJS = btree_gist.o btree_utils_num.o btree_utils_var.o btree_int2.o \
> btree_numeric.o
>
> EXTENSION = btree_gist
> -DATA = btree_gist--1.0.sql btree_gist--unpackaged--1.0.sql
> +DATA = btree_gist--1.1.sql btree_gist--unpackaged--1.0.sql

You need to add a file for going from 1.0 to 1.1.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-02-17 13:09:15 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-02-17 12:44:27 Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement