Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-15 19:49:54
Message-ID: 20140215194954.GA24455@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-15 14:35:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Patch attached.
>
> Committed with some cosmetic adjustments --- thanks!
>
> > I am not sure whether HAVE_GETOPT is the best condition
> > to use, since it's set by configure by a link based check, same goes for
> > HAVE_INT_OPTERR. The other choices would be relying on HAVE_GETOPT_H or
> > a new AC_CHECK_DECL.
>
> I'm pretty sure HAVE_GETOPT is *not* what we want to use for the variable
> declarations. I've tried HAVE_GETOPT_H for the moment, but that may need
> more tweaking depending on what the buildfarm has to say.

I only used it because it was what previously protected the getopt()
declaration in port.h... But that should probably have been depending on
!HAVE_GETOPT_H in the first place.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2014-02-15 20:15:01 Re: HBA files w/include support?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-15 19:35:02 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT