| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter |
| Date: | 2014-02-12 16:25:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20140212162531.GC12551@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:08:26PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> >On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:22:47PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> >>So, my suggestion is to just add the following sentence right after
> >>the above one.
> >>
> >>The Postgres style is an exception: the output of the date type is
> >>either MM-DD-YYYY (e.g. 12-17-1997) or DD-MM-YYYY (e.g. 17-12-1997),
> >>which is different from the date part of the output of the timestamp
> >>type.
> >>
> >>Could you consider and add this to the manual?
> >
> >Yes, I will make the change unless someone objects.
>
> Could you commit this if you feel okay? I'm sorry if I missed the
> modified article in the devel doc.
OK, attached doc patch applied to head and 9.3. Thanks for the report.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| datestyle.diff | text/x-diff | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-12 16:26:56 | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-02-12 16:10:18 | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |