Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5
Date: 2014-02-08 23:08:26
Message-ID: 20140208230826.GH10692@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-08 22:58:35 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> Another question: in order for logical decoding/replication to be
> useful, presumably one would need a primary key on every table? It's
> just I haven't seen this mentioned on the changeset extraction page in
> the docs.

Hm, that's a good point. 07cacba983ef79be4a84fcd0e0ca3b5fcb85dd65 added
configurability for that, but there at least should be a link to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-altertable.html with
some additional words.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-08 23:12:10 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-02-08 23:06:26 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT