Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD
Date: 2014-02-06 08:40:32
Message-ID: 20140206084032.GI28649@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-05 12:36:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> It may well be that your proposal is spot on. But I'd like to see some
> >> data-structure-by-data-structure measurements, rather than assuming that
> >> alignment must be a good thing.
> >
> > I am fine with just aligning BufferDescriptors properly. That has
> > clearly shown massive improvements.
>
> I thought your previous idea of increasing BUFFERALIGN to 64 bytes had
> a lot to recommend it.

Good.

I wonder if we shouldn't move that bit of logic:
if (size >= BUFSIZ)
newStart = BUFFERALIGN(newStart);
out of ShmemAlloc() and instead have a ShmemAllocAligned() and
ShmemInitStructAligned() that does it. So we can sensibly can control it
per struct.

> But that doesn't mean it doesn't need testing.

I feel the need here, to say that I never said it doesn't need testing
and never thought it didn't...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2014-02-06 08:54:12 Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2014-02-06 08:39:41 Re: PoC: Partial sort