| From: | Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 20:05:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20140204200546.GA8607@defunct.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 04/02/14 12:02, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
> <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with
> > baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4
> > CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib RAM.
>
> What CPU model? Can you post /proc/cpuinfo? The distinction between
> logical and physical cores matters here.
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 0 @ 2.20GHz
32 physical cores, 64 logical cores. /proc/cpuinfo is applied.
Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| cpuinfo | text/plain | 0 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-02-04 20:08:43 | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-02-04 20:04:14 | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |