Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Date: 2014-02-04 19:50:19
Message-ID: 20140204195019.GI32407@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-04 11:48:14 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
> <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I added -M prepared to the pgbench call in the benchwarmer script.
> >
> > The read-only tests are finished, I come to similiar results as yours:
> >
> > <http://wwwtech.de/pg/benchmarks-lwlock-read-only/>
>
> Note that Christian ran this test with max_connections=201, presumably
> to exercise the alignment problem.

I think he has applied the patch to hack around the alignment issue I
pushed to git for both branches. It's not nice enough to be applied yet,
but it should fix the issue.
I think the 201 is just a remembrance of debugging the issue.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-02-04 19:53:36 Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-02-04 19:48:14 Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition