Re: BUG #8230: Time interval size overflow

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: rok(dot)kralj(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #8230: Time interval size overflow
Date: 2014-01-25 20:56:52
Message-ID: 20140125205652.GC9750@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:03:53AM +0000, rok(dot)kralj(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8230
> Logged by: Rok Kralj
> Email address: rok(dot)kralj(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4
> Operating system: Arch Linux
> Description:
>
> As far as I know, the INTERVAL type is represented using three int32, one
> for months, days and milliseconds.
>
> However, overflow detections seems to work correctly only on these three
> types; if they get overflown indirectly, they do not get detected:
>
> SELECT INTERVAL '3000000000 days'
> ERROR: interval field value out of range: "3000000000 days"
>
> SELECT INTERVAL '2000000000 years'
> -147483648 years
>
> I'm surprised this hasn't been reported yet. The expected behaviour is to
> raise an error.

The attached patch fixes the problem:

test=> SELECT INTERVAL '2000000000 years';
ERROR: interval out of range
LINE 1: SELECT INTERVAL '2000000000 years';

It also fixes this case

test=> SELECT INTERVAL '2000000000-3 years';
ERROR: interval field value out of range: "2000000000-3 years"
LINE 1: SELECT INTERVAL '2000000000-3 years';

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
interval.diff text/x-diff 1.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rok Kralj 2014-01-25 21:07:36 Re: BUG #8230: Time interval size overflow
Previous Message Marco Atzeri 2014-01-25 20:29:22 Re: BUG #8970: ts_parse incorrectly split numbers in digit token