| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dynamic shared memory and locks |
| Date: | 2014-01-23 14:06:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20140123140659.GD7182@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-01-23 23:03:40 +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> Isn't it necessary to have an interface to initialize LWLock structure being
> allocated on a dynamic shared memory segment?
> Even though LWLock structure is exposed at lwlock.h, we have no common
> way to initialize it.
There's LWLockInitialize() or similar in the patch afair.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2014-01-23 14:11:15 | Re: dynamic shared memory and locks |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2014-01-23 14:03:40 | Re: dynamic shared memory and locks |