Re: SQL objects UNITs

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL objects UNITs
Date: 2013-12-21 17:27:57
Message-ID: 20131221172757.GR2543@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri,

* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > That said, I'm starting to wonder about a few
> > different options that might be handy- having the extension be dumpable
> > (or maybe an option to pg_dump to dump them from the DB, or not), and
> > perhaps an option to have the version # included in the dump (or an
> > option to exclude it, such as when run by pg_upgrade..?). Perhaps
> > similar things for pg_restore.
> >
> > In any case, this is certainly the way I had been hoping the discussion
> > would go..
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18778.1354753982@sss.pgh.pa.us

If you'd like to add to the discussion, then please do so. This isn't
adding anything. Tom brings up good points in that thread from last
year but my suggestion was about having a few options *in addition* to
keeping track of how extensions were installed and using that as the
default.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-22 00:18:18 Re: WITHIN GROUP patch
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-12-21 17:10:02 Re: SQL objects UNITs