Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date: 2013-12-09 19:40:56
Message-ID: 20131209194056.GA1289003@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:34:08PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > > Two naming proposals, "ROWS FROM" and "TABLE FROM", got an ACK from more than
> > > one person apiece. I move that we settle on "ROWS FROM".
> >
> > I'm not sufficiently annoyed by "ROWS FROM" to object. Other opinions?
>
> Works well enough for me.

Great. Here's the patch I'll be using.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
rename-from-table-v1.patch text/plain 43.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-12-09 20:26:25 Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Previous Message knizhnik 2013-12-09 19:40:41 In-Memory Columnar Store