Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date: 2013-12-07 15:56:15
Message-ID: 20131207155615.GB21734@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-12-07 13:58:11 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> FATAL means a backend died. It is kind of vague how FATAL and PANIC
> differ.

I don't really see much vagueness there. FATAL is an unexpected but
orderly shutdown. PANIC is for the situations where we can't handle the
problem that occurred in any orderly way.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2013-12-07 16:33:16 Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Previous Message David Johnston 2013-12-07 15:53:08 Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?