Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date: 2013-12-05 11:05:38
Message-ID: 20131205110538.GD14419@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-12-05 11:54:20 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2013/12/5 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> We can introduce some assert polymorphic function
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION notnull(any, message text) RETURNS any, that can
> be used for check inside SQL

Uh. How is that going to help applications that upgraded, without having
noticed a pretty obscure notice in the release notes?

If this were day one, I would agree we should go that way, but today...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-12-05 11:07:22 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-12-05 10:54:20 Re: Proposal: variant of regclass