Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet(at)lwn(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Date: 2013-12-04 21:09:54
Message-ID: 20131204140954.44c1563d@lwn.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:01:37 -0800
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> > Perhaps even better: the next filesystem, storage, and memory management
> > summit is March 24-25.
>
> Link? I can't find anything Googling by that name. I'm pretty sure we
> can get at least one person there.

It looks like the page for the 2014 event isn't up yet. It will be
attached (as usual) to the LF collaboration summit:

http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/collaboration-summit

I'll make a personal note to send something here when the planning process
begins and the CFP goes out.

Napa Valley...one can do worse...:)

jon

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-04 21:28:07 Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2013-12-04 21:08:13 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO