From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
Date: | 2013-12-03 19:29:32 |
Message-ID: | 20131203192932.GP17272@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Jeff Davis (pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com) wrote:
> This sounds like Inline Extensions to me, which was previously proposed.
I've not looked at that proposal very carefully, but I agree that what
we're describing is a lot closer to 'inline extensions' than 'extension
templates'.
> If I recall, that proposal trailed off because of issues with
> dump/reload. If you dump the contents of the extension, it's not really
> an extension; but if you don't, then the administrator can't back up the
> database (because he might not have all of the extension templates for
> the extensions installed). That's when the idea appeared for extension
> templates stored in the catalog, so that the administrator would always
> have all of the necessary templates present.
When it comes to dump/reload, I'd much rather see a mechanism which uses
our deep understanding of the extension's objects (as database objects)
to implement the dump/reload than a text blob which is carried forward
from major version to major version and may even fail to run. I
realize that's different from extension files which are out on the
filesystem, but I do not see that as a bad thing.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-03 19:31:17 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-03 19:27:06 | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |