Re: ECPG FETCH readahead

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date: 2013-11-12 06:01:58
Message-ID: 20131112060158.GA818667@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:17:54AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> The old contents of my GIT repository was removed so you need to
> clone it fresh. https://github.com/zboszor/ecpg-readahead.git
> I won't post the humongous patch again, since sending a 90KB
> compressed file to everyone on the list is rude.

Patches of that weight show up on a regular basis. I don't think it's rude.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-11-12 06:03:29 Updatable security_barrier views (was: [v9.4] row level security)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-11-12 04:10:51 Re: Re: Exempting superuser from row-security isn't enough. Run predicates as DEFINER?