Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)
Date: 2013-10-24 17:00:28
Message-ID: 20131024170028.GC18793@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-24 16:06:19 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 24.10.2013 09:03, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> >One open question is what to do about rounding up the size. It should
> >not be necessary, but for the fairly recent bug described at the link
> >in the comment (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56881). I
> >tried it without the rounding-up, and it fails on Ubuntu's 3.5.0-28
> >kernel (mmap returns EINVAL).
>
> Let's get rid of the rounding. It's clearly a kernel bug, and it shouldn't
> be our business to add workarounds for any kernel bug out there. And the
> worst that will happen if you're running a buggy kernel version is that you
> fall back to not using huge pages (assuming huge_tlb_pages=try).

But it's a range of relatively popular kernels, that will stay around
for a good while. So I am hesitant to just not do anything about it. The
directory scanning code isn't that bad imo.

Either way:
I think we should log when we tried to use hugepages but fell back to
plain mmap, currently it's hard to see whether they are used.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-10-24 17:09:00 Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-10-24 16:53:48 Re: RULE regression test fragility?