Re: logical changeset generation v6.2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.2
Date: 2013-10-21 19:41:49
Message-ID: 20131021194149.GL2968@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2013-10-21 21:36:02 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think this approach would have lower maintenance overhead in
> comparison to the previous solution of Handling CommandIds because it's
> actually much simpler.

Btw, I think the new approach would allow for *easier* modifications
about future code caring about visibility. Since the physical location
doesn't matter anymore it'd be much more friendly towards things like
an online compacting VACUUM and such.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2013-10-21 19:44:40 Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-10-21 19:41:16 Re: [HACKERS] Cube extension point support // GSoC'13