| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs? |
| Date: | 2013-10-18 22:44:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20131018224416.GB21813@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-18 18:46:10 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> As to your point about not wanting to do it for a single image- it seems
> we could potentially say that for every individual image proposed, but
> if we don't keep track of those images anywhere then we may not realize
> that 5 or 10 have actually been done and proposed but never integrated.
> [...] Images really can explain things in a much better
> way in many cases.
+many
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-10-18 22:46:10 | Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-10-18 22:14:30 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |