| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |
| Date: | 2013-10-16 15:39:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20131016153953.GH5319@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-16 11:18:55 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This is actually a problem that I think we have today- the expectation
> that *everyone* has to shoot down an idea for it to be rejected, but
> one individual saying "oh, that's a good idea" means it must be
> committed.
But neither does a single objection mean it cannot get committed. I
don't see either scenario being present here though.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-16 15:42:36 | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-10-16 15:24:51 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |