Re: buildfarm failures on smew and anole

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, CM Team <cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: buildfarm failures on smew and anole
Date: 2013-10-14 13:29:50
Message-ID: 20131014132950.GA25013@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-14 09:28:04 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> # By convention, we put no more than twenty tests in any one parallel group;
> # this limits the number of connections needed to run the tests.
>
> If it's not supposed to matter how many connections are available,
> then that comment is misleading. But I think it does matter, at least
> in some situations, because otherwise these machines wouldn't be
> failing with "sorry, too many clients already".

Well, you need to explicitly pass --max-connections to pg_regress.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-14 13:36:03 Re: logical changeset generation v6.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-14 13:28:04 Re: buildfarm failures on smew and anole