Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:50:09AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I looked at this but could not see how to easily pass the value of
> > 'isTopLevel' down to the SELECT. All the other checks have isTopLevel
> > passed down from the utility case statement.
>
> Yes, we cannot pass isTopLevel, but as isTopLevel is used to decide
> whether we are in function (user defined) call, so if we can find
> during statement execution (current case set_config execution) that
> current statement is inside user function execution, then it can be
> handled.
> For example, one of the ways could be to use a mechanism similar to
> setting of user id and sec context used by fmgr_security_definer() (by
> calling function SetUserIdAndSecContext()), once userid and sec
> context are set by fmgr_security_definer(), later we can use
> InSecurityRestrictedOperation() anywhere to give error.
>
> For current case, what we can do is after analyze
> (pg_analyze_and_rewrite), check if its not a builtin function (as we
> can have functionid after analyze, so it can be checked
> fmgr_isbuiltin(functionId)) and set variable to indicate that we are
> in function call.
>
> Any better or simpler idea can also be used to identify isTopLevel
> during function execution.
>
> Doing it only for detection of transaction chain in set_config path
> might seem to be more work, but I think it can be used at other places
> for detection of transaction chain as well.

I am also worried about over-engineering this. I will wait to see if
anyone else would find top-level detection useful, and if not, I will
just apply my version of that patch that does not handle set_config.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +