From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Where to load modules from? |
Date: | 2013-09-20 13:36:44 |
Message-ID: | 20130920133644.GL6056@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 16:09 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> > It shouldn't be in the commit fest if it has no patch.
> >>
> >> What should I do if my goal is to get community consensus on the best
> >> way to solve a problem, and want to start the discussion with some
> >> proposals?
> >
> > Post it to the pgsql-hackers list.
>
> The idea of using the CommitFest process to request design review was
> floated at one of the last couple of developer meetings in Ottawa.
> Personally, I'm for it.
I did it for minmax indexes on CF1 and nobody complained.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-09-20 13:43:52 | Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior |
Previous Message | Samrat Revagade | 2013-09-20 13:33:44 | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup |