| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: record identical operator |
| Date: | 2013-09-18 16:36:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20130918163645.GU2706@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Having matviews using SQL expressible features is a *good* thing.
Fine, then it should be implemented *using SQL*, which is based on
*values*, not on how the value is represented in bits and bytes.
> Having a user accessible operator is nice to have (if for no other
> reason than to allow testing for which matview rows would be
> refreshed).
If it's not actually *changing* (wrt its value), then I'm not at all
impressed with the notion that it's going to get updated anyway.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-09-18 16:39:03 | Re: record identical operator |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-09-18 16:24:44 | Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values |