From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |
Date: | 2013-09-04 02:46:38 |
Message-ID: | 20130904024638.GM21874@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 09:43:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > This has made me adjust my goal and change it so SELECT ROW(NULL) IS
> > NULL returns true, and any further nesting returns false.
>
> AFAICS, the only good argument for breaking backwards compatibility here
> is if you can convince people that the new behavior is more conformant to
> the SQL spec. Where's the chapter and verse that argues for this
> interpretation?
The SQL03 standard in section 8.7, table 14, says "degree 1: null" and
"degree > 1: all null". Does that mean they are considering nested rows
as degree > 1, or is that the number of values in the row? A footnote
says:
For all R, "R IS NOT NULL" has the same
result as "NOT R IS NULL" if and only if R is of
degree 1.
which seems to support the idea that degree is the number of values,
meaning they don't discuss nesting.
> And I will say once more that a patch that affects only the behavior of
> eval_const_expressions can be rejected on its face. That code has to be
> kept in sync with the behavior of execQual.c, not just whacked around by
> itself. And then there are the NOT NULL constraint cases to worry about.
I thought execQual.c was already not recursing so I didn't see a need to
change that.
I could not figure out how to test a NOT NULL constraint for nesting.
What is driving my research here is that our current behavior is really
not documentable.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-09-04 02:54:15 | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-09-04 02:44:33 | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |