From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
Date: | 2013-08-20 12:25:39 |
Message-ID: | 20130820122539.GA21096@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-08-20 14:15:55 +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> david=# DO $$
> >> david$# BEGIN
> >> david$# WITH now AS (SELECT now())
> >> david$# PERFORM * from now;
> >> david$# END;
> >> david$# $$;
> >> ERROR: syntax error at or near "PERFORM"
> >> LINE 4: PERFORM * from now;
> >> ^
> >> Parser bug in PL/pgSQL, perhaps?
> >
> > no
> >
> > you cannot use a PL/pgSQL statement inside SQL statement.
>
> Well, there ought to be *some* way to tell PL/pgSQL to discard the result. Right now I am adding a variable to select into but never otherwise use. Inelegant, IMHO. Perhaps I’m missing some other way to do it?
>
> If so, it would help if the hint suggesting the use of PERFORM pointed to such alternatives.
Not that that's elegant but IIRC PERFORM (WITH ...) ought to work. I
don't think the intermingled plpgsql/sql grammars allow a nice way right
now.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2013-08-20 12:30:47 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-08-20 12:24:45 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |