Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Date: 2013-08-20 01:30:33
Message-ID: 20130820013033.GU2706@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Josh Berkus (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com) wrote:
> Well, if that's the alternative, I'd vote for taking it. For me,
> personally, I think the usefulness of it would outstrip the number of
> functions I'd have to debug.

Agreed. Having it take an interval makes a whole lot more sense than
backing a decision that it should take a string-cast-to-integer.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2013-08-20 02:30:21 Re: Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-08-20 01:27:57 Re: 9.4 regression