Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
Date: 2013-08-02 20:43:30
Message-ID: 20130802204330.GS5669@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:18:15PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> > Right cause if a reviewer ends up writing (or cleaning up) all the
> > docs, I would say they deserve very close to equal credit. As an
> > example.
>
> I can do whatever we agree to in the release notes. The big question
> is whether committers can properly document these people.

I don't see why not. Most of them, if not all, already do.

> I do think the names are going to overwhelm the release note items and
> we will _again_ remove some or all names.

There's plenty of opinion to the contrary; but then it's just opinion.
I think the idea of trying it at least once has merit.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-08-02 20:48:24 Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-02 19:45:46 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up